Atm Chem Modeling Group 

GEOS–Chem
Benchmark Simulations

Last Updated April 4, 2006

Atm Chem Modeling Group 

Each release of the GEOS–Chem model is benchmarked with a standard 1 month oxidant–aerosol chemistry simulation before it is distributed to users worldwide. The results from each benchmark simulation are compared to results from the previous GEOS–Chem release (e.g. Version 5.02 is tested against Version 5.01).  In this way, potential errors in coding or in algorithm design can be spotted easily.

An optional 1 month 222Rn–210Pb–7Be simulation may also be performed to test transport, convective, and wet deposition process.

As of summer 2003, certain versions of GEOS–Chem are benchmarked with a 1 year oxidant–aerosol chemistry simulation. The results of this simulation are compared to observations as well as to 1 year benchmarks of previous versions. This allows both model-model and model-observation comparisons to be made.

Prof. Daniel Jacob is currently responsible for examining the results of the GEOS–Chem benchmark simulations.

1 month Oxidant–Aerosol Chemistry Benchmark
with coupled sulfate aerosol chemistry

Dates of Run: July 1, 2001 to August 1, 2001
Vertical Resolution:

GEOS-3 with 30 sigma levels.

(GEOS-3 normally has 48 sigma levels; we vertically bunch levels 22 and higher into groups of 2 or 4 levels in order to gain computational advantage.)

Horizontal Resolution:

4° latitude x 5° longitude

Chemical tracers:

Gas-phase tracers:

NOx, Ox, PAN, CO, Lumped >=C4 Alkanes, ISOP, HNO3, H2O2, MEK, Acetaldehyde, Lumped Aldehyde >=C3, MVK, Methacrolein, PMN, PPN, Lumped Alkyl Nitrate, >=C3 Alkenes, C3H8, HCHO, C2H6, N2O5, HNO4, Methyl Hydro Peroxide, DMS, SO2, SO4, MSA, NH3, NH4, NIT, Hydrophilic BC, Hydrophilic OC, Hydrophobic BC, Hydrophobic OC, Dust Aerosol (4 size bins), Sea Salt Aerosol (2 size bins)

Aerosol tracers:

DMS, SO2, SO4, MSA, NH3, NH4, NIT, Hydrophilic BC, Hydrophilic OC, Hydrophobic BC, Hydrophobic OC, Dust Aerosol (4 size bins), Sea Salt Aerosol (2 size bins)

Chemical Mechanism:

SMVGEAR II (Jacobson et al, 1997), using 90 chemical species, approximately 300 kinetic reactions (including rapid recycling of peroxides as well as H2SO4—HNO3—NH3 chemistry), and 51 photolysis reactions.

View a detailed description of the SMVGEAR II chemistry mechanism in PDF format.

Photolysis
Mechanism:

FAST-J algorithm (Wild et al, 2000)

Operations:
  • Transport (Lin & Rood, 1996, 1997
  • Cloud Convection (Lin, 1996)
  • Boundary Layer Mixing (Allen, 1996)
  • Emissions
  • Dry Deposition (Jacob et al, 1995)
  • Chemistry
  • Wet Deposition (Jacob et al, 2000)
Diagnostic Output:
  • Optical Depths
  • Noontime J(O3) and J(NO2)
  • Transport fluxes (N/S, E/W, up/down)
  • Biomass burning emission fluxes
  • Biogenic emission fluxes
  • Anthropogenic emission fluxes
  • Dry deposition fluxes and velocities
  • Surface Pressure
  • Sources of CO
  • Sources of NOx
  • Sources and sinks of biogenic acetone
  • Concentrations of chemically produced OH and NO
  • Tracer concentrations
  • Chemical production & loss of Ox and CO
  • Lifetime of Methylchloroform (CH3CCl3)
  • DAO 3-D winds & temperatures
  • Air masses, grid box heights

All diagnostics above are saved as monthly means.

The following types of plots and summaries are created from the oxidant-aerosol simulation:

  • Budget of Ox and CO
  • Summary of total emissions (this version and previous version)
  • Differences of total emissions (this version - previous version)
  • Frequency distribution (this version - previous version) for tracers
  • Ratios (this version / previous version) of JO3, JNO2 at the surface
  • Ratios (this version / previous version) of JO3, JNO2 at 500 hPa
  • Ratios (this version / previous version) of tracers at the surface
  • Ratios (this version / previous version) of tracers at 500 hPa
  • Tracer concentration at the surface
  • Tracer concentration at 500 hPa
  • Zonal mean tracer concentration

1 month 222Rn–210Pb–7Be Benchmark

Dates of Run:

January 1, 2001 to January 1, 2002

Vertical
Resolution:

GEOS-3 with 48 sigma levels 

Horizontal
Resolution:

4° latitude x 5° longitude

Chemical
tracers:

222Rn, 210Pb, 7Be

Chemical
Mechanism:

Radioactive decay (first-order loss)

Photolysis
Mechanism:

None

Operations:
  • Transport (Lin & Rood, 1996, 1997)
  • Cloud Convection (Lin, 1996)
  • Boundary Layer Mixing (Allen, 1996)
  • Emissions
  • Dry Deposition (Jacob et al, 1995)
  • Chemistry
  • Wet Deposition (Jacob et al, 2000)
Diagnostic
Output:
  • Source and decay terms
  • Dry deposition fluxes and velocities
  • Surface Pressure
  • Tracer concentrations
  • DAO 3-D winds & temperatures
  • Air masses, grid box heights

All diagnostics above are saved as monthly means.

The following types of plots and summaries are created from the 222Rn-210Pb-7Be simulation:

  • Budgets of 222Rn, 210Pb, 7Be
  • Frequency distribution (this version - previous version) for tracers
  • Ratios (this version / previous version) of tracers at the surface
  • Ratios (this version / previous version) of tracers at 500 hPa
  • Tracer concentration at the surface
  • Tracer concentration at 500 hPa
  • Zonal mean tracer concentration

1 year Oxidant–Aerosol Chemistry Benchmark
with coupled sulfate aerosol chemistry

Spin-up:

January 1, 2000 to January 1, 2001

Dates of Run:

January 1, 2001 to January 1, 2002

Vertical Resolution:

GEOS–4 with 30 hybrid levels OR GEOS–3 with 30 sigma levels.

GEOS–3 normally has 48 sigma levels and GEOS–4 normally has 55 hybrid levels. We lump stratosphereic levels together in groups of 2 or 4 levels in order to gain computational advantage.

Horizontal Resolution:

4° latitude x 5° longitude

Chemical tracers:

Gas-phase tracers:

NOx, Ox, PAN, CO, Lumped >=C4 Alkanes, ISOP, HNO3, H2O2, MEK, Acetaldehyde, Lumped Aldehyde >=C3, MVK, Methacrolein, PMN, PPN, Lumped Alkyl Nitrate, >=C3 Alkenes, C3H8, HCHO, C2H6, N2O5, HNO4, Methyl Hydro Peroxide, DMS, SO2, SO4, MSA, NH3, NH4, NIT, Hydrophilic BC, Hydrophilic OC, Hydrophobic BC, Hydrophobic OC, Dust Aerosol (4 size bins), Sea Salt Aerosol (2 size bins)

Aerosol tracers:

DMS, SO2, SO4, MSA, NH3, NH4, NIT, Hydrophilic BC, Hydrophilic OC, Hydrophobic BC, Hydrophobic OC, Dust Aerosol (4 size bins), Sea Salt Aerosol (2 size bins)

Secondary Organic Aerosols (optional):

ALPH, LIMO, ALCO, SOA1, SOA2, SOA3, SOG1, SOG2, SOG3.


Chemical Mechanism:

SMVGEAR II (Jacobson et al, 1997), using 90 chemical species, approximately 300 kinetic reactions (including rapid recycling of peroxides as well as H2SO4—HNO3—NH3 chemistry), and 51 photolysis reactions. 

View a detailed description of the SMVGEAR II chemistry mechanism in PDF format.

Photolysis Mechanism:

FAST-J algorithm (Wild et al, 2000)

Operations:
  • Transport (Lin & Rood, 1996, 1997)
  • Cloud Convection
    • GEOS–3: (Lin, 1996)
    • GEOS–4: (Rasch, 2001)
  • Boundary Layer Mixing (Allen, 1996)
  • Emissions
  • Dry Deposition (Jacob et al, 1995)
  • Chemistry
  • Wet Deposition (Jacob et al, 2000)
Diagnostic Output:
  • Optical Depths
  • Noontime J(O3) and J(NO2)
  • Biomass burning emission fluxes
  • Biogenic emission fluxes
  • Anthropogenic emission fluxes
  • Dry deposition fluxes and velocities
  • Surface Pressure
  • Sources of CO
  • Sources of NOx
  • Sources and sinks of biogenic acetone
  • Concentrations of chemically produced OH & NO
  • Tracer concentrations
  • Chemical production & loss of Ox and CO
  • Lifetime of Methylchloroform (CH3CCl3)
  • DAO 3-D winds & temperatures
  • Air masses, grid box heights

All diagnostics above are saved as monthly means.

The following types of plots and summaries are created from the 1-year NOx–Ox–hydrocarbon simulation:

  • C2H6 from 3 benchmark simulations vs. aircraft data
  • C3H8 from 3 benchmark simulations vs. aircraft data
  • CO from 3 benchmark simulations vs. aircraft data
  • H2O2 from 3 benchmark simulations vs. aircraft data
  • HNO3 from 3 benchmark simulations vs. aircraft data
  • NO from 3 benchmark simulations vs. aircraft data
  • O3 from 3 benchmark simulations vs. aircraft data
  • PAN from 3 benchmark simulations vs. aircraft data
  • Model CO vs ship track data
  • Model column CO from 3 benchmark simulations vs. observations
  • Model O3 from 3 benchmark simulations vs. ozonesonde data

http://www.as.harvard.edu/ctm/geos/geos_benchmark.html